9 of the biggest OSHA fines of Q4 2024


This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

In 2024’s final quarter, some of the largest OSHA citations issued to construction firms stemmed from two of the most well-identified hazards: falls and trench cave-ins.

The agency has national emphasis programs for those standards, as they are some of the deadliest and most easily identified perils on a jobsite.

OSHA publicizes instances in which it issues large fines, as a means of showing its regulatory power and calling attention to violations. In the fourth quarter of last year, the agency highlighted several employers facing hefty penalties across multiple jobsites and inspections.

In construction, these cases often involve residential builders committing repeat violations, which carry a larger initial penalty. The original fine amounts are sometimes negotiated down in settlement, so they do not always represent the amount paid. Cases where firms have settled the initial amounts already have been noted here.

RRC Home Improvement
Initial fines: $328,545 (across three inspections)
Status: Contested

Federal OSHA safety officials have levied nearly $330,000 in initial fines against a Newark, New Jersey-based roofing contractor after three inspections in the summer of 2024 allegedly discovered that workers were exposed to falls.

In June, OSHA said inspectors on a Dover, Delaware, jobsite received reports of employees of RRC Home Improvement working on a roof without fall protection. A month after warning the company, OSHA opened inspections at two worksites in Lodi, New Jersey, in July. Those inspections were part of the agency’s national emphasis program for falls in construction. 

The agency alleges it again observed employees working without required fall protection, as well as a lack of hard hats, eye protection and fire extinguishers in addition to non-compliant pump jack scaffold poles and unsafe ladder use.

OSHA said it has cited the company for failing to provide workers with fall protection in five different inspections since 2017 and added RRC Home Improvement to the Severe Violators Enforcement Program. After the inspections, OSHA issued four willful and seven serious violations in December, totaling $328,545 in initial penalties. RRC Home Improvement is contesting all of the fines.

RRC Home Improvement did not respond to requests for comment.

Fino Exterior Inc.
Initial fines: $302,935 (across four inspections)
Status: Contested

OSHA inspectors allegedly observed employees of a Lake Zurich, Illinois-based roofing contractor working on top of residential structures without legally required fall protection on four occasions in 2024.

On Feb 6., June 12, Aug. 16 and Oct. 16 of last year, OSHA says it inspected Fino Exterior Inc. employees working without protections on four different Illinois jobsites. OSHA says federal inspectors have cited the contractor eight times since 2020 and that it currently is liable for $65,115 in unpaid OSHA penalties.

OSHA cited the company for the February offense in March, and for the other three occasions in December. Fino Exterior faces citations for 13 safety violations and a proposed $302,935 in penalties. The company is contesting the fines.

In addition to a lack of fall protection, OSHA cited Fino Exterior for:

  • Permitting employees to work near energized power lines.
  • Not providing employees with hard hats.
  • Failing to train workers in fall protection hazards and prevention.
  • Lack of eye protection for workers operating pneumatic nail guns.
  • Improper use of ladders.

The company has no publicly available contact info, and could not be reached for comment.

595 Construction
Initial fines: $287,465 (across three inspections)
Status: Contested

OSHA has cited a framing contractor $287,465 after it allegedly observed workers exposed to fall hazards without proper protection three times at three residential jobsites in the same neighborhood in the same month. 

The agency says inspectors first observed Crystal Lake, Illinois-based 595 Construction employees at work without required equipment on two residential buildings on May 10 and again on May 31. 

As a result, OSHA cited the company for allowing employees to work without fall protection at heights greater than 6 feet and failing to certify they trained workers to recognize hazards or prevent falls. OSHA also claims 595 Construction permitted unsafe use of ladders, failed to ensure workers had certification to operate industrial vehicles and used damaged slings to hoist materials.



Source link

Post a Comment